My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 05/2006

ITHAKA ON THE HORIZON: A Greek-American Journey



  • StatCounter

Greek Heritage Festival Photos

  • P7110628
    Saint Demetrios Greek Orthodox Church, Saco, Maine, USA 10-12 July 2009

Halki Seminary

  • DSC00655
    The Patriarchal Theological Seminary of Halki is located on the Turkish island known as Heyelbiada in the Bosporus straits. It was closed in 1971 by the Turkish government and is the subject of much controversy since it is the only seminary in Turkey and the position of Ecumenical Patriarch can only be filled by a Turkish citizen. Sign the petition to reopen it at

Index of Posts

« The Inconvenient Serbs | Main | Going Beyond a War of Words »

04 May 2007


Ted Laskaris

Thanks for the link. Since you mentioned the Ecumenical Patriarchate, recent intelligence has repeatedly warned of plots to burn the place down and cause the Patriarch to flee. Needless to say, these plotters (both Islamists and supra-nationalists) do not give a hoot about what America and/or eunuch Europe are going to say or do re. the destruction of the locus of Eastern Orthodoxy. As the conflict between the army and Erdogan heats up, we should expect nasty surprises. Turkey is slowly but irrevocably approaching a showdown that won't pass before one of the opponents is completely disabled. It's going to be a bloody mess. Even worse, the army is rapidly arriving at the point of no return: they have come to believe they can fight and win the "two wars" -- one inside the country and one outside it against the Kurds and the Americans. These are dark times indeed.



I will be linking to other posts on your blog(s) as I take small bites at it. It has not disappointed me and I rather like the variety.

I have written previously about the growing threat posed by Turkish Deep State and its designs on the Christian and Armenian Patriarchs here:

Once they are eliminated the last vestige of Christianity in Turkey will be expunged and even the illusion of religious tolerance will no longer be necessary.


As long as there is a Turkey, a victorious post WW1 Turkey, there will always be gathering storms.

By a rare quirck of fate the turks, having sided , fought, and lost together with the entente forces,are an egregiously unique example of how to lose a war and emerge victorious. Whislt the entente forces were smothered into dust, monarchies deposed, territories truncated, patched up babel nations created, the fortunate turks under the leadership of a homosexual, transvestite, masonic, salonican jew, Ataturk, carved and crafted a fantastic piece of real estate with turks and for turks. The masonic troika of Enver, Talaat and Evid, carried out the most successful ethnic cleansing in history. Uprooting, erradicating and exterminating a 3000 year old race of armenians from their ancestral homes is no mean achievement, even in war time conditions. This successful surgical intervention of ethnicide ( which puts the inept and bumbling germans into the shade, which failed even to deport their own alien jews from their own homeland)was followed with the routing of the greek national forces and the erradication of all greek presence and settlements on the eastern mediteranean coast. Former greek byzantine settlements were wiped out without any recourse to legality or justice. Might is right.
This does not make any sense, turkey loses the war,commits crimes of unspeakable nature, disposes of its old garb as ottoman, cleanses itself of the christians upon whose ancestral lands he is now permanently occupying, and emerges as the new secular and modern turkey. Accepted and admired by all european castrati and western nations.

Whatever happens in turkey, whether it implodes or explodes, it is of concern to greece. The downside it is that the present nomenclature is unfit , unprepared, and unsuitable to deal with the potential oportunities that such a cataclysm in neighboring mongoland might offer.

If turkey were to implode it is doubtful whether the states that nurture historical grievances ( greece,armenia,syria,iran)are in a postion to take a profit from its disintegration. The Kurds might create some hullaballo, but turkey can deal with them effectively.
The gravest consequences for greece, stemming out of a conflict in that region will arise from the "invasion armada" of a tsunami of refugees, escapees, stragglers, smugglers, and other flotsam which will pour out from the region and whose first port of call will be greece. It will resemble the second fall of constantinople.

The government does not have the capacity, the will nor the wherewithal to manage a disaster of such proportions.

As for christian vestiges in turkey, they are few and far in between. The greek and armenian patriarchates can be dispensed with a wave of the hand by the turk government if they wish to do so. The few greeks and armenians remaining in the main towns in western turkey, are cowed into submission and live timidly and unobstrusively, their only sustaining backbone is their businesses and material assets which helps them lead a life of contented captives. Both patriarchates pay lip service and are unashamedely subservient to turkey. They will run away , one day, when the turk tires of them, but they will be surprised when the flleing day arrives, and running west into greece they come up to a welcoming string of mosques and the ululuations of the imam on duty , in a land they imagined to have been a bastion and sanctuary of orthodoxy.



Your rendition of Turkey's emergence from the ashes of defeat is spot on. Say what you will about Ataturk, it was quite an accomplishment. I have no doubt that whatever happens, Turkey will still be a formidable dangerous entity. Even if the secularists win they have shown on countless occasions that they don't have what it takes to build a truly democratic, peaceful nation.

Most of the possible scenarios for the future are grim and I don't think anyone, especially Greece is ready.


The Greeks should have been preparing for this for the last 50 years. But no, we were raising the placards of Che Guevara - the great 1821 revolutionary fighter of the proletariat! These Golden Opportunities only come every 100 years or so. Another missed opportunity brought on by bumbling sycophantic spoilt children of energetic politicians of yesteryear when Greece used to dream of the Megali Idea.


"... the fortunate turks under the leadership of a homosexual, transvestite, masonic, salonican jew, Ataturk, carved and crafted a fantastic piece of real estate with turks and for turks."...

And how would you know that Peter? That he was a homosexual and transvestite?

You're pathetic.


Turkey has no chance of becoming a regional superpower.


Read and heed:


Its ridiculous because Turkey has no control or influence over any regional or global economic clearinghouse.


Their economy is mostly a mirage like every other economy or internal economy except the private sector. They dont have a seat at the main private club table and I dont see them becoming main players. In order to becoming a regional superpower you have to control your own clearinghouse, central bank trading and resource bourses etc which I see no indications of. GDP growth doesnt make you a superpower or major world power.


Unless they go "rogue" but that means an entire Cold War ruling clique has to be destroyed and they enter an uncertain path which they probably wont risk.


I see no "indications" that their currents accounts, balance of payments and trade and investment cycles are deviating from the Euro-Atlantic bloc in any siginificant fashion. Their process of "indigenization" is also insignificant. Historically, most powers who have historically been in the Third World and are trying to either "catch up" or take their own path have crashed and burned. The problem with "hysterisis" is that you never catch up to the leader like Achilles and the Toirtoise because the leader has such a great lead on you and can use all kinds of methods to keep you at the back of the track including indirect punishment for trying to sit at his table. At most the Turks could be using it as an attempt mostly to gain concessions from the Euro-Atlantic powers and I doubt their ruling circles want to lose hunior partner status in the political, economic and military organisations of the Euro-Atlantic centres.


Also now that NATO is in Central Asia and possibly moving into the Middle East all the countries between Europe and those regions are canned food including Turkey and whatever they export to those regions they will lose to European, American, Chinese and Russian companies. The benefits of them going rogue against the blocs could be catastrophic and Im sure they know that.


Read here for example,:



Apologies for the delay in responding to your comments.Thanks for the link, very interesting article. We can only hope that Turkey's economic situation can curtail her appetite for adventurism. It certainly did not hold Greece back from it's disastrous course in Asia Minor in 1922.

Erdogan and Davutoglou sense an opportunity, Turkey will fill the vacuum left by the US in the eastern Mediterranean.


I doubt the US will be leaving the East Med anytime soon and I doubt even more Turkey can fill any such gap against other NATO states(France, Great Britain etc) and also the Russian Federation, Greece, Cyprus and Israel. Turkey's adventurism may lead to many things including a cascading economic crisis and a sovereign Kurdistan. And Turkey still has serious internal problems that have merely been swept under the rung from the 1960's and onwards.


Let's hope for the sake of Greece and Cyprus that you are right and I am wrong.


Turkey poses no threat to Greece in the age of lightning long range war, standoff weapons and force multipliers Greece just has to keep the hightech qualitative advantage(a larger navy and air force would be nice although they are more then capable of tangleing with Turkey in the air and sea), develop multiple alliances and reconstruct her economy rapidly in order to clear the table with her enemies.


The recent reorganisation of the Armed Forces is a step in the right direction for lightning war in Thrace the Aegean and Cyprus, although we need more systems and more imaginative organisational structures. The problem is we have to take the diplomatic card out of their hands because they are always using third parties to achieve gains against us(Cyprus etc), or they will prefer to start an incident in an isolated spot that streches our reaction capabilities(Kastellerizo etc). Personally, I have been arguing for the first strike for a long time now in the Aegean.


Greece has a chance to destroy the Turkish Navy twice in 1987 and 1996 but the politicians and diplomats intervene to stop everything. The Turks are merely trying to nibble at the cheddar block but we should just smash them in the entire Aegean Sea once and for all.


We're sounding rather bellicose today :) Have you ever been in a shooting war? I assure you it is not as easy as you make it sound. Never underestimate the Turks, when Greeks do that disaster soon follows. The last great Greek strategic thinker was Panagiotis Kondylis, who unfortunately died in 1998. He advocated a doctrine in which a first strike was the keystone but only under the right conditions. Greece has no coherent strategic doctrine just as it has no viable economic plan. That is because you need leadership to create both. A war would be disastrous for both countries. How can Greece maintain its qualitative advantage at time when Greeks are lining up for food at soup kitchens.


This is true. First strike should have occured a long time ago.


I think it is unwise to give Greece a huge advantage in the qualitative sphere as it pertains to its navy and air force. It doesn't take long to run out of missiles and parts and I daresay the Greek military supply system is probably not up to the task of maintaining the momentum needed to sustain operations in an air/sea conflict in the Aegean. Think Argentina. The last time there was a general mobilization during the invasion of Cyprus, it turned into a fiasco. I have great respect for the Greek military based on personal experience, one of the few Greek institutions that functions with a modicum of efficiency. Unfortunately advancement is based on political loyalty rather than professional expertise. One of the reasons for the Asia Minor debacle was the replacement of Venizelist officers by less experienced Monarchists. Old habits die hard.


Alot of what you say is true. Short of a dissolution of NATO(now since NATO is expanding both Greece and Turkey are being put into chicken coops) or a major change in the world system I dont see general war breaking out between Greece and Turkey but the usual incidents in the Aegean and possibly along the borders. The recent building of defensive works along the Thracian border is a step in the right direction. The Turk try to play a war of attrition using nibbling tactics and diplomatic games aided by third parties(think of the role of Kissinger in Cyprus and Holbrooke during the Imia Crisis-when the Turk had no diplomatic card during the Seismik crisis they balked at confrontation for example)to try to attain superior position. So either one has to put up with rounds and cycles of provocations or go to first strike and neither Greece or Turkey have excalated to that level.


And for all their pseudo-patriotism the Right have been the ones who have always implemented the foreign policy of the Great Powers, it was George Papandreou for example who sent the Greek division to Cyprus(withdrawn by the Colonels) and his son Andreas who gained advantage for Greece during the Seismik Crisis. And now its this clown GPAP Jr who has thrown the country into the hands of the World Bank/IMF?ECB/Goldman Sachs and is ready to allow NATO to divide the Aegean for the energy MNC conglomerates and to pasteurize and colonize Greece in the name of Euro-Atlantic golden age plutocracys "Globalisation" project.


By the way this is a great site.


The difference between Greece and Turkey has always been their approach to the "Great Powers." The Turks played them for all it was worth while giving them very little in return, the Greeks on the other hand remained loyal allies even when it cost them dearly.

I'm glad you like MGO, it's been awhile since I have had a good give and take on these issues. Visit Hellenic Antidote blog if you haven't already done so. The discussions there about Greek issues are always lively, entertaining and informative.


And what were the "ideal conditions" Kondylis regarded as appropriate for a first strike?


This is an excellent paper that answers your questions:

The conditions are never "ideal" for a first strike but there are always pre-conditions that make such action necessary and elements that must be in place before making such a move.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Become a Fan

Searching for Ithaka

  • Keep Ithaka always in your mind. Arriving there is what you're destined for. But don't hurry the journey at all. Better if it lasts for years, so you're old by the time you reach the island, wealthy with all you've gained on the way, not expecting Ithaka to make you rich. Ithaka gave you the marvelous journey. Without her you wouldn't have set out. She has nothing left to give you now. And if you find her poor, Ithaka won't have fooled you. Wise as you will have become, so full of experience, you'll have understood by then what these Ithakas mean. C. P. Cavafy


  • This site may include excerpts of copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available consistent with the established practice of academic citation and in an effort to advance understanding of the issues addressed by My Greek Odyssey blog. This constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without fee or payment of any kind to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. All original material produced by the author and published on this site is copyrighted.


    User comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will not be accepted and will be removed from the site. Users who continue to violate any of my posting standards will be blocked.